I became a sex therapist in the mid-1970s because I was impressed
with how well standard sex therapy techniques were able to help
people overcome embarrassing problems such as difficulty having an
orgasm, painful intercourse, premature ejaculation, and impotence.
The use of sex education, self-awareness exercises, and a series of behavioural techniques could cure many of these problems within a
matter of only several months. I noticed that as people learned more
about the sexual workings of their bodies and gained confidence with
their sexual expressions, they would also feel better about
themselves in other areas of their lives.
But there were always a number of people in my
practice who had difficulty with sex therapy and the specific
techniques I gave them as "homework." They would
procrastinate and avoid doing the exercises, would do them
incorrectly, or, if they could manage some exercises, would report
getting nothing out of them. Upon further exploration I discovered
that those clients had me major factor in common: a history of
childhood sexual abuse.
Besides how they reacted to standard
techniques, I noticed other differences between my survivor and
non-survivor clients. Many survivors seemed ambivalent or neutral
about the sexual problems they were experiencing. Gone was the usual
sense of frustration that could fuel a client's motivation to
change. Survivors often entered counseling because of a partner's
frustration with the sexual problems, and
they seemed more disturbed by the consequences of sexual problems
than by their existence. Margaret,1 an incest survivor, tearfully
confided during her first session, "I'm afraid my husband will
leave me if I don't become more interested in sex. Can you help me
be the sexual partner he wants me
to be?"
Many of the survivors I talked with had been
to sex therapists before, with no success. They had histories of
persistent problems that seemed immune to standard treatments. What
was even more
revealing was that survivors kept sharing with me a set of symptoms,
in addition to sexual functioning problems, that challenged my
skills as a sex therapist. These included --
* Avoiding or being afraid of sex.
* Approaching sex as an obligation.
* Feeling intense negative emotions when touched, such as fear,
guilt, or nausea.
* Having difficulty with arousal and feeling sensation.
* Feeling emotionally distant or not present during sex.
* Having disturbing and intrusive sexual thoughts and fantasies.
* Engaging in compulsive or inappropriate sexual behaviours.
* Having difficulty establishing or maintaining an intimate
relationship.
Considering their sexual histories, touch
problems, and responses to counseling, I quickly realized that
traditional sex therapy was horribly missing the mark for survivors.
Standard treatments such as those described in the early works of
William Masters, Virginia Johnson, Lonnie Barbach, Bernie
Zilbergeld, and Helen Singer Kaplan often left survivors feeling
discouraged, disempowered, and in some cases,
retraumatized. Survivors approached sex therapy from an entirely
different angle than other clients did. Thus they required an
entirely different style and program of sex therapy.
Over the course of the last 20 years, the
practice of sex therapy has changed considerably. I believe many of
these changes were the results of adjustments other sex therapists
and I made to be more effective in treating sexual abuse survivors.
To illustrate, I will show how sex therapists have challenged and
changed six old tenets of traditional sex therapy through treating
survivors.
Tenet 1: All Sexual Dysfunctions Are
"Bad" In general, traditional sex therapy viewed all
sexual dysfunctions as bad; the goal of treatment being to cure them
right away. Techniques were directed toward this goal, and
therapeutic success was determined by it. But the sexual
dysfunctions of some survivors were, in fact, both functional and
important. Their sexual problems helped them avoid feelings and
memories associated with past sexual abuse.
When Donna entered therapy for difficulty
achieving orgasm, she seemed most concerned with the effect her
problem was having on her marriage. She had read many articles and a
few books on how
to increase orgasmic potential but had never followed through with
any suggested exercises. For several months, I worked unsuccessfully
with her, trying to help her stick with a sexual enrichment program.
Then we decided to shift the focus of her
treatment. I asked Donna about her childhood. She reported some
information that hinted at the possibility of childhood sexual
abuse. Donna said that during her upbringing her father was an
alcoholic whose personality changed when he was drunk. She disliked
it whenever he touched her, she pleaded with her mom for a dead-bolt
lock on her bedroom door when
she was 11 years old, and she had few memories of her childhood in
general.
After several sessions during which we
discussed dynamics in her family of origin, Donna told me she had a
very upsetting dream [that included a graphic description of sexual
abuse by her father that the client felt was historically true].
No wonder Donna had been unable to climax. The
physical experience of orgasm had been intimately associated with
her past abuse. Her sexual dysfunction had been protecting her from
the memory
of her father's assault.
In numerous other cases, I encountered a
similar process. Steve, a 25-year-old recovering alcoholic, had a
chronic problem with premature ejaculation. As we explored his inner
psychological experience in therapy, he was able to identify that
when he allowed himself to delay ejaculation, he would start to feel
an urge to rape his partner. Premature ejaculation was protecting
him from this very upsetting feeling.
It wasn't until he connected this urge to rape with his intense rage
at his mother for sexually abusing him as a child that he was able
to resolve the internal conflict and comfortably prolong
gratification.
Impressing upon Donna or Steve the idea that
their sexual dysfunctions were bad would have done them a
disservice. Their dysfunctions were powerful coping techniques.
I also encountered another type of situation
that challenged the old tenet that sexual dysfunctions are bad. For
some survivors who had experienced little difficulty with sexual
functioning, the onset of sexual dysfunction signaled a new level of
recovery from sexual abuse.
Tony was a 35-year-old single man who had been
in and out of abusive relationships for years. His partners were
often sexually demanding and generally critical. Tony's father had
raped him repeatedly when he was young, and his mother had molested
him in his teens. As Tony resolved issues related to his past
abuse, his choice of partners improved. One day he told me that he
had been unable to function sexually with his new girlfriend. This
was extremely unusual for him.
"She wanted to have sex, so she began to
do oral sex on me," Tony explained. "I got an erection and
then lost it and couldn't get it back." "Did you want to
be having sex?" I asked him. "No, I really wasn't
interested then," he replied. "So your body was saying no
for you," I remarked. "Yeah, I guess so," he said
somewhat proudly. "Wow, do you realize what's happening?"
I declared, "You're becoming congruent! For all these years,
your genitals have operated separately from how you really felt. Now
your head, heart, and genitals are lining up congruently. Good for
you!"
That day in therapy with Tony was a turning
point for me as a sex therapist. l was amazed that I was actually
congratulating him on his temporary sexual dysfunction. It felt
appropriate. Instead of functioning, the goal of treatment shifted
to self-awareness, self-care, trust, and intimacy-building. Insight
and authenticity became more important than behavioural functioning.
While healthy sexual functioning is a
desirable long-term goal, conveying the idea that all dysfunctions
are bad and must be immediately cured is too simplistic. In working
with survivors and others, sex therapists need to see sexual
problems in context and we need to find out how people feel about a
symptom before attempting to treat it. Therapists must respect
dysfunctions, learn from them, work with them, and resist the urge
to automatically try to change them.
Tenet 2: All Consensual Sex Is Good
In general, traditional sex therapy didn't make distinctions between
different types of sex as long as sex was consensual and did not
cause physical harm. That way of thinking does not hold up
considering the sexual addictions and compulsions that are by
products of sexual abuse. Little distinction was given to the type
of sex that fostered addictive and compulsive behaviour. The lack of
distinction between the more specific nature of sexual interaction
has left some people, including survivors, fearful of all sex. From
working with survivors we have learned that sexual addictions and
compulsions develop to a type of sex that incorporates or mimics the
dynamics of sexual abuse.
On business trips Mark, a married man with two
children, could not stop himself from cruising strange neighborhoods
looking for pretty women whom he could watch from inside his car
while masturbating. He knew all the video parlors in a four-state
area and could not pass one without stopping to masturbate. He
sought counseling because his wife had caught him in bed with his
secretary. She threatened to leave him unless he got help.
When Mark entered therapy he described himself
as being addicted to sex. I asked him to describe sex. He used terms
like, "out-of-control, impulsive, exciting and degrading."
Mark's preoccupation and addiction was to a type of sex that was
fueled by secrecy and shame. It was undertaken in a high state of
dissociation; filled with anxiety; focused on stimulation and
release; and lacking in true caring, emotional intimacy, and social
responsibility. This type of sex was associated with power, control,
dominance, humiliation, fear, and treating people as objects. It was
the same type of sex that he was exposed to as a young man when his
mother's best friend would pull down his pants, molest him, and
laugh at him.
Helping Mark recover involved helping him make
connections between what happened to him in the past and his present
behaviour. He needed to learn the difference between abusive and
healthy sex. Sex, per se, was not the problem. It was the type of
sex he had learned and developed arousal patterns to that had to
change. Healthy sex, like healthy laughter, incorporates choice and
self-respect. It is not
addictive.
To help people overcome fears of sex, sex
therapy involves teaching conditions for healthy sexuality. These
include consent, equality, respect, safety, responsibility,
emotional trust, and intimacy. While abstinence can be an important
part of recovery from sexual addictions, it won't be enough unless
new concepts and approaches to sex are also learned.
Tenet 3: Fantasy and Pornography Are Benign
In traditional sex therapy, therapeutic use of sexual fantasy and
pornography was generally viewed as benign and often even
encouraged. Because the goal of therapy was functioning, fantasy and
pornography were seen as therapeutically beneficial: giving
permission, offering new ideas, and stimulating arousal and
interest. Books on becoming orgasmic frequently recommended that
women read something juicy, like Nancy Friday's collection of sexual
fantasies, to "get them over the hump" and be able to
climax.
In the early years of my practice, like other
sex therapists I knew, I kept a collection of pornography in my
office to lend out. While most pornography was degrading to women
and contained descriptions of sexual abuse and irresponsible sex,
the common attitude in the field was that "thinking it" is
not "doing it." The implication was that sexual thoughts
and images are harmless; as long as you don't act out a
perversion, it's not damaging.
Through working with survivors, sex therapists
have learned that sexual fantasies and pornography can be very
harmful. Reliance on them is often a symptom of unresolved issues
from early sexual trauma.
Joann and her husband, Tim, came to see me for
marital sexual counseling. On the very rare occasions when Joann was
interested in sex with Tim, she would manipulate the lovemaking in
such a way as to encourage Tim to have forceful anal sex with her.
Sexual contact invariably concluded with Joann curled in a ball on
the bed sobbing and feeling isolated. Tim had some difficulty
understanding why he went along with this scenario, but what I found
equally curious was Joann's response when I asked her why she did
it. Joann shared that ever since she was about 10 years old, she had
been masturbating to fantasies of anal rape. They turned her on more
than anything she knew.
In the beginning of their marriage, Joann was
able to have sex without the fantasies; but as stresses with Tim
increased, she found herself more and more drawn to them. Often the
fantasies would intrude during sex. She felt controlled by them,
filled with shame and disgust.
Joann's behaviour had its roots in early abuse
by her father. He would spank her in a sexual manner or penetrate
her anally with his finger as he masturbated himself. The sexual
fantasies Joann developed were not harmless or enhancing her
sexuality. They were upsetting and unwanted, symptoms of unresolved
guilt and shame from the abuse she had experienced in childhood. Her
fantasies were reinforcing abuse dynamics, reenacting the trauma,
punishing her unjustly, and expressing deep emotional pain at the
betrayal and abandonment by her parents.
For survivors, using pornography and
experiencing certain sexual fantasies are often part of the problem,
not part of the solution. Rather than condemn certain sexual behaviours, I encourage people to evaluate their sexual activities
according to the following criteria:
* Does this behaviour increase or decrease your
self-esteem?
* Does it trigger abusive or compulsive sex?
* Does it emotionally or physically harm you or others?
* Does it get in the way of emotional intimacy?
Sex therapists can help people understand the
origins of their negative sexual behaviours by showing compassion and
not condemning. Survivors benefit from learning ways to gain control
over unwanted reactions and behaviours.2 They can develop new ways of
increasing arousal and enhancing sexual pleasure such as staying
emotionally present during sex, focusing on body sensations, and
creating healthy sexual fantasies.
Tenet 4: Use Standardized Techniques In a
Fixed Sequence
Another tenet of traditional sex therapy was the importance of using
a fixed series of behavioural techniques. Sex therapists relied
heavily on "sensate focus" exercises that were developed
by William Masters and Virginia Johnson3. Versions of these
techniques exist in the standard treatments for low sex desire,
pre-orgasmic, premature ejaculation, and impotence. These structured
step-by-step behavioural exercises were designed to improve
self-awareness, sexual stimulation, and partner communication.
Through working with survivors, however, we have learned that sex
therapy techniques need to be expanded, modified, and
individualized. Time must be spent teaching appropriate
developmental skills and pacing therapy to prevent retraumatization.
One day in 1980, the bulb on my little
projector broke and I could not show Fred and Lucy the tape on the
first level of sensate focus exercises. Instead I gave them a
handout and complete verbal instructions. They were to take turns
lying down and massaging each other in the nude. The next week they
came back and reported on how it went. Lucy said the exercise was
all right, but Fred's belt
buckle kept hurting her as she passed over it. Even though they had
been given specific instructions to take their clothes off, Lucy, an
incest survivor, said she never heard them. Instead, she adapted the
technique to make it less threatening.
Standardized techniques performed in a fixed
sequence generally don't work for survivors because these techniques
fail to respect the important needs survivors have for creating
safety, pacing experiences, and being in control of what's
happening. Just being able to sit, breathe, feel relaxed, and stay
present while touching one's own body can be a challenge.
Survivors need a lot of options for exercises
that offer opportunities to heal without being overwhelmed. I
rely on the techniques for relearning touch described in my book The
Sexual Healing Journey. These techniques can easily be modified,
adapted, and rearranged in different sequences by survivors
themselves.
It is essential that sex therapists assess a
client's readiness before suggesting a particular sex therapy
exercise. I often find that a client's curiosity about an exercise
is a good indicator of readiness to try it. Starting, stopping, and
shifting among different techniques. Nudity, genital exploration and
exchanging sexual touch with a partner are often advanced
challenges, generally not appropriate to suggest
in the early stages of therapy.
Sexual healing is generally an advanced type
of healing work for survivors, less important than issues such as
overcoming depression, improving self-esteem, resolving
family-of-origin issues, and securing physical safety and health to
name a few. Any sex therapy therefore needs to take a back seat to
general recovery issues that might arise. Sex therapy needs to be
integrated with other aspects of resolving sexual abuse.
Tenet 5: More Sex Is Better
In traditional sex therapy, the main criteria by which we judged
success was how regularly and frequently clients were having sex. I
used to ask lots of questions about frequency and evaluated success
by how much a couple conformed to the national average of engaging
in sexual activity once or twice a week. This focus on quantity
often ignored issues of quality. Working with survivors taught me
that with physical and sexual interaction, high quality is more
important than large quantity.
Jeannie, a 35-year-old survivor of childhood
molestation, and her boyfriend, Dan, sought therapy to address
sexual intimacy problems. They planned to marry in the next year. It
was concerning both of them that Jeannie would "check out"
during sex. "I feel like I'm making love to a rag doll,"
Dan lamented. She agreed to sex to please him, fearing he would end
the relationship if she declined
too often.
For Jeannie, more sex brought on more problems
of dissociation. The sexual contact she was having was getting in
the way of her recovery from sexual abuse and her ability to create
an honest intimacy with Dan. In therapy, as the reality of what was
going on emerged, the couple decided to take a vacation from sex for
awhile. Jeannie needed time and permission to validate her inner
experience. The break from sex enabled her to honor her real
feelings, learn new skills, and eventually be able to say yes to it
without anxiety. Jeannie also learned that Dan loved her for
herself, supported her getting in touch with her inner feelings, and
viewed sexual interaction as less important than emotional intimacy
and honesty.
When survivors progress in healing and start
having sexual relations more regularly, it's not uncommon for the
frequency of their sexual interactions to vary. To ensure positive
sexual experiences, survivors often need to give themselves a safe,
comforting environment and plenty of time for intimate relating. Sex
emerges from mutual good feelings and a sense of emotional
connection between partners. The high quality and specialness of
sexual encounters become more significant than how often they
occur.
Tenet 6: An Authoritative Behavioural
Goal-Focused Style Works Best In traditional sex therapy, the
therapist's role was primarily to present a program of exercises and
help clients follow that program to achieve functioning. Therapists
offered sex education and worked to improve couples' communication.
The therapist was the authority, suggesting techniques, pacing
interventions, and monitoring progress. Little attention was
paid to how a therapist's style might be influencing the progress of
therapy. Working with survivors has taught many sex therapists that
their therapeutic style is as important as any intervention.
For many survivors, sex is one of the most difficult areas to
address in recovery Just hearing the word "sex," or saying
it can bring on a minor panic attack. Survivors can easily
unconsciously project feelings toward the offender and the abuse
onto the therapist and the sexual counseling. After all, therapists
seem invested in survivors being sexual, and the process of therapy
strains a survivor's sense of control and protection. This high
potential for negative transference needs to be addressed if sex
therapy with survivors is to be successful.
To minimize negative transference, I suggest
therapists adopt the following premise: Do the opposite of what
happened in the abuse. For instance, because the victim was
dominated and disempowered
in abuse, it makes sense that therapy should focus on empowering the
client and respecting his or her reactions to it. Therapists need to
explain techniques and interventions, encouraging clients to
exercise choice at all times. Suggestions, not directions or
prescriptions, should be given. Rather than admonish clients for
their resistances and relapses, therapists should reframe these as
inevitable, seek to understand, and work with them.
Because sexual abuse involved a traumatic
violation of boundaries, it's important that sex therapists be
extremely good at maintaining clear emotional and physical
boundaries. Talking about sex can stir up sexual feelings. It's
inappropriate to combine sex-focused sessions with touch.
Several years ago, I was appalled when a
prominent sex therapist told me how she held and rubbed her female
client's hand during a session to demonstrate different stroking
techniques for masturbation. Therapy needs to be a safe place
physically and psychologically for everyone, at all times.
It's also important for sex therapists not to dominate the content
and course of therapy. Personally, I find I'm most effective when I
establish a therapeutic relationship with the client in which we're
working together. The client sets the pace and direction and
presents the content; I provide encouragement, support, guidance,
creative ideas, insight, information and resources.
The Value of Change There is no question that
the challenge of treating survivors has revolutionized and improved
the practice of sex therapy Personally, I know that the changes I
have made in how I perceive
and practice sex therapy have made me a better therapist with all of
my clients, regardless of whether they were abused. Other sex
therapists seem to agree that the practice of sex therapy has become
more client centered and respectful of individual needs and
differences. Learning about the dynamics of sexual trauma has helped
therapists become more aware of the conditions necessary for sex to
be positive and life affirming for everyone.
Endnotes
1 This is a pseudonym, as are all names in
this article.
2 For more information on techniques, see
The Sexual Healing Journey, HarperCollins, 1991.
3 For a description of these techniques, see
William Masters et al., Masters and Johnson on Sex and Human Loving,
Little
Brown and Co., 1986.
Wendy Maltz, M.S.W., is clinical director of
Maltz Counseling Associates. She is the author of the Sexual Healing
journey: A Guide for Survivors of Sexual Abuse and Caution: Treating
Sexual
Abuse Can Be Hazardous to Your Love Life.
See also:
Choosing
a therapist
Back to Sexuality
Home |