Research Findings on the Sexual Abuse of Males

Sexual Abuse of Males havoca supportResearch Findings on the Sexual Abuse of Males
by David 0. McCall, M.Div.

A major difficulty in the study of child sexual abuse and adult survivors is accurately assessing occurrence. Incidence — the number of cases occurring in a given time frame (usually years) — is expressed as a number or rate (e.g.,100,000 per year or 1.5 per 1,000 children). Prevalence — the proportion of a population — is usually expressed as percentage (such as 20% of all boys).

Incidence numbers of sexual abuse of males rely on cases actually reported to authorities. However, all researchers agree that only a small percentage of cases are reported. Therefore, incidence vastly underestimates the numbers (Peters, Wyatt and Finkelhor, 1986).

Prevalence rates of sexual abuse of males are affected by a wide range of factors, including method of data collection, type of sample (e.g., clinical, probability or non-probability, college students, general populations, etc.), and definition used for sexual abuse (such as age limits, victim/perpetrator relationship and age difference, and type of abuse — contact vs. non-contact). Thus, it is not surprising that prevalence rates for at least one sexually abusive incident prior to age 18 range from six to 62% for females, and three to 31% for males (Wyatt and Powell, 1988). Furthermore, the general caveat is that even in anonymous prevalence studies males are usually under-represented due to factors working against acknowledgment. The number of persons affected is large, even at the lowest prevalence rates. If the more common numbers of one in three women and one in five men are accepted, the occurrence rate is staggering.

Why are men significantly under-represented in both incidence and prevalence? David Finkelhor (1984) suggests three reasons. 1) Boys grow up with the male ethic of self-reliance. They are supposed to be able to take care of themselves. Abuse violates this ethic. 2) The stigma of homosexuality and society’s anxiety about it creates fear in boys of being labeled homosexual since most perpetrators are male. Parents may collude in this by not reporting to authorities if a son discloses abuse to them. 3) Boys have more to lose by reporting. They generally are allowed more independence, unsupervised activity, and range of movement than girls. They fear reporting would curtail this.

The Virginia Bureau of Child Protective Services Report (1989) adds other reasons. Among them are: 1) males in our culture are taught that men are not victims; 2) boys fear being punished or held responsible for the abuse; and 3) in many cases boys do not perceive the activity as abusive. Many male survivors who eventually self-identify as gay believe that they wanted the sexual activity to happen and see themselves as the seducer of the adult. They feel responsible no matter how negative the outcome.

Self-identified heterosexual men often harbor fears that something in them triggered the abuse and lingering doubts about their sexuality haunt them. If the abuse was by a woman, this may be seen as sexual initiation, even though clinically we see negative effects.

The long-term negative effects of abuse are not disputed. Browne and Finkelhor’s (1986) review of the literature on females identified depression, self-destructive behaviour, anxiety, self distrust, isolation, sexual maladjustment, substance abuse and poor self-esteem as major problems.

Briere et. al. (1988) compared 40 men and 40 women. Each group consisted of 20 abused persons. Men and women did not differ on negative outcome measures. Abused individuals were always significantly more negative on measures than the non-abused. Swett et. al. (1990) studied 125 consecutive male patients and found 48% acknowledged a history of sexual and/or physical abuse. The highest negative scores on outcome measures were always for those with histories of sexual abuse only or with both physical and sexual abuse. Both of these studies used treatment populations only.

Freeman-Longo (1986) used a prison population of sex offenders who themselves admitted abuse. They reported anger, hurt, frustration, fear of intimacy, and re-enactment of their own abuse as major outcomes. Bruckner and Johnson (1987) found that anger, sexual confusion, fear of intimacy and trust issues were among the concerns that abuse survivors commonly introduced in group therapy. Additionally, men acted out more externally through acts of aggression; women survivors tended to internalize their responses via depression and self-punishment.

Mike Lew‘s list (1988), put together by his clients, is a two-page single line listing of after effects. In addition, Mary Beth Williams (1990) reported that almost all of her 61 male respondents had full patterns of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms on her multiple measures of PTSD. The existing body of literature on the negative effects of sexual abuse on adult male survivors is small, but it is growing.

References
Briere, J., Evans, D., Runyz, M., & Wall, T. (1988). Symptomology in men who
were molested as children: A comparison study. American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry, 58 (3): 457-461.
Browne, A. & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review
of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1): 66-77.
Bruckner, D.F. & Johnsm, P.E. (1987). Treatment for adult male victims of
child sexual abuse. Social Casework: The Journal of contemporary Social
Work, 2: 81-87
Finkelhor, David. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New
York: Free Press.
Freeman-Longo, R. (1986). The impact of sexual victimization on males. Child
Abuse and Neglect, 10: 411-414.
Lew, Mike. (1988, 1990). Victims no longer: Men recovering from incest and
other child sexual abuse. New York: Harper and Row.
Peters, S.D., Wyatt, G.E. & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Prevelence, in D.
Finkelhor (Ed.). Sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publications.
Swett, C., Surrey, J. & Cohen, C. (1990). Sexual and physical abuse
histories and psychiatric symptoms among male psychiatric outpatients.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 147 (5): 632-636.
Williams, M.B. (1990). Post-traumatic stress disorder and child sexual
abuse: The enduring effects. Unpublished doctoral disseration.
Wyatt, G.E. & Powell, G.J. (1988). ldentifying the lasting effects of child
sexual abuse: An overview. In G.E. Wyatt and G.J. Powell (Eds.), Lasting
effects of child sexual abuse: 11-17. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
David 0. McCall, M.Div., is a pastoral counselor and doctoral candidate of
Catholic University in Washington, D.C.

Tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
HAVOCA

About HAVOCA

Support, Information and Guidance for adult victims of child abuse and their support networks.

One Response to Research Findings on the Sexual Abuse of Males

  1. AvatarAnastasia says:

    I have tried so many different types of ways to deal with my experiences as a child and nothing has helped. The trauma from my childhood is a hindrance to my relationship and my parenting in my life in general. I stumbled across this website and I am hopeful to attend groups or seminars. I want my life back…I need to heal not just for me but for my kids

Leave a Reply - please note HAVOCA does not provide direct support via these comments. If you would like support please use our contact form or forums. Please use a name you are comfortable sharing online.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.